Saladin and the Fall of the Kingdom of Jerusalem, by Stanley Lane-Poole
Is Saladin And The Fall Of The Kingdom Of Jerusalem, By Stanley Lane-Poole publication your preferred reading? Is fictions? Exactly how's concerning past history? Or is the most effective seller novel your choice to satisfy your spare time? Or even the politic or spiritual publications are you looking for now? Below we go we offer Saladin And The Fall Of The Kingdom Of Jerusalem, By Stanley Lane-Poole book collections that you need. Lots of numbers of books from numerous fields are supplied. From fictions to scientific research and also spiritual can be searched and also found out right here. You may not worry not to discover your referred publication to check out. This Saladin And The Fall Of The Kingdom Of Jerusalem, By Stanley Lane-Poole is one of them.
Saladin and the Fall of the Kingdom of Jerusalem, by Stanley Lane-Poole
Free Ebook Saladin and the Fall of the Kingdom of Jerusalem, by Stanley Lane-Poole
Many of the earliest books, particularly those dating back to the 1900s and before, are now extremely scarce and increasingly expensive. We are republishing these classic works in affordable, high quality, modern editions, using the original text and artwork.
Saladin and the Fall of the Kingdom of Jerusalem, by Stanley Lane-Poole- Amazon Sales Rank: #13740517 in Books
- Published on: 2015-03-19
- Original language: English
- Number of items: 1
- Dimensions: 8.50" h x 1.31" w x 5.50" l, 1.46 pounds
- Binding: Paperback
- 522 pages
About the Author Surname is hyphenated in modern bibliographies, though not in this book.
Where to Download Saladin and the Fall of the Kingdom of Jerusalem, by Stanley Lane-Poole
Most helpful customer reviews
4 of 4 people found the following review helpful. Eulogy not Biography: A Disservice to Saladin By Helena P. Schrader In his introduction to this book, Lane-Poole claims that "no complete Life of the celebrated adversary of Richard Coeur de Lion" is available in the English language. This may have been true when the book was written at the end of the 19th century, but it is no longer the case. Seduced by the low price and thinking that the biography of someone who lived 800 years ago need not be recent, I bought the biography anyway. It was a mistake.While understanding that every biographer is to some extent the captive of his/her sources, this book is far more than biased: it is a long eulogy that singularly fails to provide the analysis and context vital to a good biography. Instead, Lane-Poole slavishly follows his pro-Saladin sources without standing back to question or balance these sources with information drawn from other chronicles and historians or - indeed - simple common sense.For example, he repeatedly mentions that Christian clerics were prepared to absolve Christian leaders of oaths made to non-Christians - but does not once mention that Muslim clerics told their fighting men exactly the same thing only in reverse: that they need not keep their word with non-Muslims. Likewise, it gets very tedious to have every tactical defeat of a Christian force portrayed as a "humiliating retreat" with the Christians slinking away "with their tails between their legs" - in one case this was after just one week in the field! -- while every set back Saladin suffered (and he sometimes spent many months in pointless sieges!) is explained away as a wise decision not to pursue a time-consuming campaign or the need to let his troops go home to see their families. Indeed, Lane-Poole mentions several times how attached Muslims are to their wives and children, but does not credit Christians with the same feelings.As for Saladin's defeat at Mont Gisard, where Saladin's army of 20,000 was put to flight by roughly 500 knights led by a 16 year old suffering from leprosy, it is glossed over as "inexplicable" and takes up less than two pages of the narrative. A real historian would have been intent on explaining both how it happened - and what Saladin learned from it; as a biographer, the latter point is particularly important as such a bitter defeat (Saladin had to escape on a pack camel and lost almost his entire body guard) surely left its scars on his psyche.It is likewise the mark of a dilettante rather than a historian to claim that Richard I "was honeymooning" on Cyprus, when in fact he was conquering the island from a tyrant and by so doing secured the lines-of-communication and a breadbasket for the crusader states for the next hundred years. Indeed, the Latin Kingdom of Cyprus outlived the crusader kingdoms by more than 200 years.In fairness, however, I should mention that Lane-Poole clearly had visited Cairo and Damascus and other key cities, and his careful and intelligible descriptions of what they were like in Saladin's time and what had changed since (upto his present in the late 19th century) were the highlights of this bookYet Lane-Poole's bias in favor of Islam is so extreme it is even applied to little things such as the way the "wooden [sic] bells of the Christians harshly clashed [wood?] instead of the sweet and solemn chant of the muezzin." (As someone who hears the call to prayers five times a day, I beg to differ with that utterly subjective statement!)About four fifths of the way through the book, Lane-Poole casts aside all pretense of being a historian and biographer and declares his partisanship in the statement: "But the students of the Crusades do not need to be told that in the struggle of civilization, magnanimity, toleration, real chivalry, and gentle culture were all on the side of the Saracens." (Chapter XIX) Now, students of the crusades know just the opposite: that there were atrocities, betrayals, cruelties, excesses and also magnanimity, generosity, courage and gentle culture on BOTH sides.The greatest weakness of this book is that by its excessive bias it detracts from its hero. Saladin deserves our respect because he was exceptional, not because he was perfect. Saladin stands out as an impressive and attractive example of integrity, tenacity, leadership, piety and generosity - particularly when compared to his successors, such as Baibars. He was undoubtedly a more chivalrous figure than Guy de Lusignan, and even Christians despised and repudiated butchers like Ranaud de Chatillon. But Saladin deserves a real biography that attempts to explain him as a statesmen and a military leader; this book is not it. I strongly recommend therefore more recent biographies of Saladin -- they are worth the higher price.
0 of 0 people found the following review helpful. The true story behind "The Kingdom of Heaven" By Michael If you are interested in the Crusades, this is the book for you. It tells the story of where Salidin came from, how he attained his control of the "saracens" army, his conquering of much of the Frankish kingdoms, and finally, Richard the Lionhearts' retaking of much of those kingdoms, as well as his attempt to take back Jerusalem.
0 of 0 people found the following review helpful. Good book to read By Ahmad A well written and informative book, I have his previous book and all are very well written by him. He doesn't sympathize with any community or religion and he have just written the facts and his style of writing is unique and fascinating.
See all 5 customer reviews... Saladin and the Fall of the Kingdom of Jerusalem, by Stanley Lane-PooleSaladin and the Fall of the Kingdom of Jerusalem, by Stanley Lane-Poole PDF
Saladin and the Fall of the Kingdom of Jerusalem, by Stanley Lane-Poole iBooks
Saladin and the Fall of the Kingdom of Jerusalem, by Stanley Lane-Poole ePub
Saladin and the Fall of the Kingdom of Jerusalem, by Stanley Lane-Poole rtf
Saladin and the Fall of the Kingdom of Jerusalem, by Stanley Lane-Poole AZW
Saladin and the Fall of the Kingdom of Jerusalem, by Stanley Lane-Poole Kindle
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar